![capturing reality site down capturing reality site down](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41hxXY8z8rL.jpg)
"Coal can continue to play an important role, but we must address carbon emissions," he said. energy mix as cutbacks to greenhouse-gas emissions become increasingly important. Jerry McNerney, D-Calif., pushed back, arguing that the regulations will ensure that coal remains part of the U.S. Whitfield echoed the comment, saying: "People tell us they would not do it because they cannot meet these new regulations." "EPA's proposed standards for new coal-fired power plants would effectively prevent any new plants from being constructed," Manchin said. There was also disagreement during the hearing about the impact of the regulations on the coal industry. In the same breath, however, she said: "We see carbon capture and sequestration as being a future technology that will very much be in use." "It's clear that carbon-capture-and-sequestration technology is available," McCabe commented. Yet there were moments where she appeared to falter in attempting to defend the technology. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., to block the rule, flatly refused to concede any of the points made by the critics. McCabe, who was asked to testify on the rulemaking as well as on a legislative proposal by Manchin and House Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Rep.
![capturing reality site down capturing reality site down](https://peakactivity.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/AR_cognitive_load-768x512.jpeg)
![capturing reality site down capturing reality site down](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/feOtZugQv58/maxresdefault.jpg)
Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said in testimony as a witness at the hearing, adding: "For the first time ever, the federal government is trying to force an industry to do something that is technologically impossible to achieve." "The Environmental Protection Agency has chosen a regulatory path devoid of common sense," Sen. Detractors say they show just how unrealistic the standard is, citing delays and cost overruns at the plants as evidence of the difficulty utilities will have in implementing the rule. are working to deploy the technology on a commercial scale, however, and each one has received substantial government subsidies.ĮPA backers say the plants demonstrate the feasibility of the regulations. John Shimkus, R-Ill., said, addressing Janet McCabe, EPA's acting assistant administrator for air and radiation, at a hearing convened by the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy and Power.Ĭarbon-capture technology has been thrown into the limelight following EPA's release of draft regulations in September requiring new power plants to use it to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, the most common greenhouse gas. "You're saying the technology is available, we're saying it's not," Rep. Coal-state lawmakers sparred with a top Environmental Protection Agency official Thursday over whether carbon-capture-and-storage technology is commercially viable.